The
growth in CHP capacity has been substantial as it appears on the
table. It has been strongest in the countries, which have also had
the strongest growth in district heating capacity. This suggests
that operators that construct new district heating schemes consider
application of CHP a rational and viable solution to enhance energy
production and reduce overall costs.
The
relatively low penetration of CHP in district heat production in
France should be seen in the context of the difficulties for
independent producers of entering the national electricity market.
The
same policies that have created a high penetration of DH in
Scandinavia have also created a very high share of combined
production connected to the district heating systems. Other
countries boast higher penetrations of CHP in heat generation in
percent, but under more special circumstances, which may not be
universally applicable.
The
lesson to be learnt in this context is that it is feasible for a
comprehensive national policy to reach, as in Finland, an almost 80%
share of DH produced in combined production. The Finnish example
shows that this can be reached by a balanced fuel input, i.e.
without depending on a single fuel type. DH and CHP certainly offer
a vast potential for increased energy efficiency in the energy
sector.